The term “Parenting Plan” is widely used for a number of different purposes in Nevada’s Family Courts.

Quite often in custody cases, a client gets nailed to the wall for something they said in a text or social media post. Sometimes they don’t. What makes the difference?

One question that is ever present in divorce cases with very young children is whether it is acceptable for infants to have overnight visits away from the primary caregiver.

The short answer is yes, children can have a voice, but they will not be given a choice in who they will live with.

It is a sad fact that custody battles are frequently waged using stories that just aren’t true.

Nevada law provides for two types of child custody: (1) Legal Custody and (2) Physical Custody.

Child custody issues are magnified this time of year. There are the arguments over who gets what days, what traditions are continued and how to divvy up all the extended family parties.

The Parental Rights Protection Act of 2015, known in Nevada legislative circles simply as “AB 263,” began as a response to a particular decision by the Nevada Supreme Court.

The Las Vegas Review Journal reported that fewer people than ever are embracing the institution of marriage and opting to have children anyway.

The Supreme Court of Nevada recently issued a number of opinions, one of which affects parents, parents who never married in particular, and what they may do relative to relocation with their children when their relationship ends.